| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Recent versions of git do not output progress without this flag when not connected to a tty.
|
Your change looks good - and to get things done I would probably have ended up with a similar solution. Something I am wondering about is whether we should break support for git pre 1.7 which didn't yet have the --progress flag. Probably that wouldn't be such a good idea, and a prior check to repo.git.version() could help to fix this. Something I don't like about git.version() yet is that it would call a command every time and return a string that needs to be parsed manually. Instead the method could be implemented on the git command type itself to cache the result, and return parsed information, something like: def version(self):
res = get_git_version_output()
return parse_res_into_tuple()
which could return a tuple with all version integers, like (1,7,3,2). What do you think ? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
--progress is not a valid flag for earlier versions of git, so we check for the version before using it.
|
I've tried implementing something like what you suggested. I'm not sure what version the --progress flag was introduced in, though -- I just put down 1.7.0.0 as a guess. Also, I don't have earlier versions on my system and it would be a pain to install them, so I haven't really tested whether the code works when git.version >= (1,7,0,0) returns False. In principle it should work, though... I tried running nosetests but I couldn't seem to get it to work (even without those commits I made.) I get like 96 errors and 1 failure. Are the tests supposed to be broken, or am I doing it wrong? Also fixed up some indentation in the previous commit (spaces -> tabs). |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
The tests are supposed to run, except for two which will require a git-daemon to run (the error message would tell you what to do though). Besides I just noticed that its probably not a good idea to override git.version directly, as this breaks code for everyone who wanted to use the 'old' version as git.version(). Hence I suggest it to be renamed to version_info, which resembles sys.version_info. Once you could verify the tests are still working, especially the push/pull tests which use the git-daemon, I will have a look and see which version introduced --progress, in order to set the version to compare to correctly. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Most of the errors are AttributeErrors saying that various objects have no attribute called rorepo. Any idea what might be the cause of that? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Actually I have no idea. I know that the rorepo attribute is created on the base type for all test cases, and on my recent checkout of master it works without an issue. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Hmm. I switched to your version of nose but the problem remains.. just to make sure I am getting things right: to run the tests, I just need to run nosetests from the root of the project directory tree, right? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Yes, it will do from the root or from the git subdirectory. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Is it possible for the tests to be run on just your end? I really can't get it to work on my box. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Ok, will do. I might not get to it too soon, as I am actually applying plenty of changes in another branch which will clearly collide with these changes here. Nonetheless I try to maintain master in the meanwhile, so lets see when I get to it. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Alright then. I've renamed version to version_info like you suggested. Sorry I couldn't help more! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you forgot to convert the strings to integers.
The line should be something like
tuple(int(n) for n in version_numbers.split('.'))
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I have implemented the contents of this pull request and pushed the changes to the new 0.3 branch. This is to indicate that GitPython 0.3 reached the end of its life and is in maintenance mode. A proper release of 0.3 will follow. Master now moved on to the latest stable development, which will be 0.4 one day. As master was reset, you will have to reset your local master as well. Thanks for your participation, |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Remove duplicate `const`
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
These 3 commits do the following: