This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 26, 2026. It is now read-only.
Add SECURITY.md, referencing the GitPython one - #59
Merged
Byron merged 1 commit intoJan 5, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
EliahKagan
added a commit
to EliahKagan/gitdb
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
Along with gitpython-developers/smmap#59 and a forthcoming related PR in GitPython, this will fix gitpython-developers#116.
EliahKagan
added a commit
to EliahKagan/GitPython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
This expands `SECURITY.md` to affirm the claims in the new `SECURITY.md` files in gitdb and smmap that vulnerabilities found in them can be reported in the GitPython repository with the same link as one would use to report a GitPython vulnerability, as well as to note how the distinction between affected package can be specified when it is known at the time a vulnerability is reported. Along with gitpython-developers/smmap#59 and gitpython-developers/gitdb#117, this fixes gitpython-developers/gitdb#116.
EliahKagan
added a commit
to EliahKagan/GitPython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
This expands `SECURITY.md` to affirm the claims in the new `SECURITY.md` files in gitdb and smmap that vulnerabilities found in them can be reported in the GitPython repository with the same link as one would use to report a GitPython vulnerability, as well as to note how the distinction between affected package can be specified when it is known at the time a vulnerability is reported. Along with gitpython-developers/smmap#59 and gitpython-developers/gitdb#117, this fixes gitpython-developers/gitdb#116.
EliahKagan
added a commit
to EliahKagan/GitPython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
This expands `SECURITY.md` to affirm the claims in the new `SECURITY.md` files in gitdb and smmap that vulnerabilities found in them can be reported in the GitPython repository with the same link as one would use to report a GitPython vulnerability, as well as to note how the distinction between affected package can be specified when it is known at the time a vulnerability is reported. Along with gitpython-developers/smmap#59 and gitpython-developers/gitdb#117, this fixes gitpython-developers/gitdb#116.
Byron
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2025
Byron
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, minimal is good.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Reviewers
1 more reviewer2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will fix gitpython-developers/gitdb#116, when taken together with related forthcoming PRs in the gitdb and GitPython repositories.
I don't know if you want to include information about the specific versions that are supported. Readers may infer this from a combination of the way it works as described in the GitPython policy and what versions of smmap exist, I am not sure. I kept the file minimal for now.