fix: make TimePartitioning repr evaluable - #110
Conversation
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign. Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it! and we'll verify it. What to do if you already signed the CLAIndividual signers
Corporate signers
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
CLAs look good, thanks! ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
plamut
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The main concern with this change, while nice on its own, is that it can break existing user code as the failed tests show. I'm not sure if evaluability of the representation is really worth it.
@shollyman Your thoughts?
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Thank you for your help @plamut. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
plamut
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is much better, thanks for the refactoring! Changing only the representation is much less of a concern than changing a method signature.
One of the tests broke, though, and should be fixed, the rest are some very minor comments.
(not sure why the CI status is not reported, though...)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Peter Lamut <plamut@users.noreply.github.com>
|
We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for all the commit author(s) or Co-authors. If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google. ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
CLAs look good, thanks! ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@shollyman Any follow up on the open internal questions you raised? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@shollyman Friendly ping. :) Any updates on those internal questions to date? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
cguardia
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ready, but seems like nothing can be done until the internal issue is resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Documentation for behavior is getting updated. Lack of value will be treated as DAY interval. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* --- ## [2.2.0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/compare/v2.1.0...v2.2.0) (2020-10-19) ### Features * add method api_repr for table list item ([#299](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/299)) ([07c70f0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/07c70f0292f9212f0c968cd5c9206e8b0409c0da)) * add support for listing arima, automl, boosted tree, DNN, and matrix factorization models ([#328](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/328)) ([502a092](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/502a0926018abf058cb84bd18043c25eba15a2cc)) * add timeout paramter to load_table_from_file and it dependent methods ([#327](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/327)) ([b0dd892](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/b0dd892176e31ac25fddd15554b5bfa054299d4d)) * add to_api_repr method to Model ([#326](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/326)) ([fb401bd](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/fb401bd94477323bba68cf252dd88166495daf54)) * allow client options to be set in magics context ([#322](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/322)) ([5178b55](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/5178b55682f5e264bfc082cde26acb1fdc953a18)) ### Bug Fixes * make TimePartitioning repr evaluable ([#110](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/110)) ([20f473b](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/20f473bfff5ae98377f5d9cdf18bfe5554d86ff4)), closes [#109](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/109) * use version.py instead of pkg_resources.get_distribution ([#307](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/307)) ([b8f502b](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/b8f502b14f21d1815697e4d57cf1225dfb4a7c5e)) ### Performance Improvements * add size parameter for load table from dataframe and json methods ([#280](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/280)) ([3be78b7](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/3be78b737add7111e24e912cd02fc6df75a07de6)) ### Documentation * update clustering field docstrings ([#286](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/286)) ([5ea1ece](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/5ea1ece2d911cdd1f3d9549ee01559ce8ed8269a)), closes [#285](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/285) * update snippets samples to support version 2.0 ([#309](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/309)) ([61634be](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/61634be9bf9e3df7589fc1bfdbda87288859bb13)) ### Dependencies * add protobuf dependency ([#306](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/306)) ([cebb5e0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/cebb5e0e911e8c9059bc8c9e7fce4440e518bff3)), closes [#305](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/305) * require pyarrow for pandas support ([#314](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/314)) ([801e4c0](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/commit/801e4c0574b7e421aa3a28cafec6fd6bcce940dd)), closes [#265](https://www.github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery/issues/265) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please).
Fixes #109 🦕