This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2026. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI think we should execute the statements immediately regardless of whether autocommit is set or not. Because Spanner handles DDL separately from transactions, there's no way to roll back DDL statements (which we will need to clearly document) and so I think having different behavior based on autocommit is unnecessary.
@AVaksman WDYT? Note that we now support executing multiple DDL statements at once which should alleviate the batching concern.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality@larkee, no problem, I'll delete the line.
I'm writing a system test to check the case.
Also I've found out that in !autocommit mode DDLs are also not executed, even if one will call commit(). Will fix it in this PR as well.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality@larkee, you know, about regarding autocommit mode... I think users don't usually go deep into frameworks code. So, we support DDLs separated with ;, still users may use frameworks, which are generating and executing DDLs one by one. In this case it's probably better to look after autocommit mode, to make DDLs pumping up in !autocommit mode - to execute them all at once little bit later.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityHmm, that's a good point. In that case, we'll need to add run_prior_DDL_statements() to commit() as currently the statements aren't being executed even when commit() is called.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.