| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
2.2.3 is EOL from CRuby perspective, so they will not backport the security fix to a maintained gem (I [asked](ruby/erb#114 (comment))). This thus deviates from the CRuby 3.1 stdlib version and bumps to 4.0.4.1 (as bundled with Ruby 3.4.x, maintained at https://github.com/ruby/erb/tree/ruby-3.4). This still has Ruby 2.7 compatibility and the two relevant "breaking" changes seem innocuous: https://github.com/ruby/erb/blob/ruby-3.4/NEWS.md (Drop deprecated -S option from command / Bump `required-ruby_version` to Ruby 2.7+) Signed-off-by: Chad Wilson <29788154+chadlwilson@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Is the extensions thing OK @headius ? 2.2.3 didn't have an extension (or the java stub). |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
2.2.3 is EOL from CRuby perspective, so they will not backport the fix to a maintained gem (I asked).
This thus deviates from the CRuby 3.1 stdlib version and bumps to 4.0.4.1 (as bundled with Ruby 3.4.x, maintained at https://github.com/ruby/erb/tree/ruby-3.4).
This still has Ruby 2.7 compatibility and the two relevant "breaking" changes seem innocuous: https://github.com/ruby/erb/blob/ruby-3.4/NEWS.md (Drop deprecated -S option from command / Bump required-ruby_version to Ruby 2.7+)
My only open question with this is whether the gem extension stub introduced in erb 4.0.x is a problem, since this did not exist with 2.2.3. Is something like #9289 needed for 9.4 - even though it's not there currently?