PR #231 — dependency update review.

Package: j178/prek-action v2.0.4 → v2.0.6 (GitHub Actions)
Semver risk: patch
Type: development / CI-only — used once, by the linting job in .github/workflows/pre-commit.yml:32. No runtime or packaging impact.

Changelog (v2.0.5, v2.0.6):

• Breaking changes: none. No inputs or outputs added, removed, or renamed; this repo passes no with: block, so there is no input surface to break.
• Security fixes: none referenced.
• Peer/transitive changes: none re-exported. The @actions/cache and semver bumps in the compare view are internal to the action.
• Functional: musl Linux target support (unused — runner is ubuntu-latest); color disabled in prek cache dir output (bugfix for ANSI codes leaking into the parsed path); known-version manifest entries for prek 0.4.6–0.4.10.

No code changes required.

CI: failing — but not because of this bump. The Linting check fails on the Regenerate files hook (rebuild-from-specs, entry: make build), which leaves js/package.json dirty with 0.2.18 → 0.2.19. Cause is setuptools-scm version derivation, not the action: tag v0.2.18 sits on main's HEAD, so any branch one or more commits past it resolves to 0.2.19.devN+..., which pep440_to_npm_semver truncates to 0.2.19. Confirmed against a control — PR #230 still runs prek-action@v2.0.4 at the same commit base and fails the identical hook. Every other hook passes here.

Nothing to change in this PR; the codegen/versioning issue should be tracked separately (it will block every PR until the next release tag lands). Not approving only because Linting is red — if it is a required check it will gate the merge button regardless of cause.

One note for the record: the action's prek-version input defaults to latest, so this bump does not change which prek binary CI runs (both v2.0.6 here and v2.0.4 on #230 installed prek 0.4.11, while uv.lock pins 0.4.5 locally). Out of scope here.

@rtibblesbot's comments are generated by an LLM, and should be evaluated accordingly

Ran a dependency-update review pipeline over the version bump:

• Classified the bump by semver (patch / minor / major) and dependency type (production vs. development)
• Extracted the changelog and release notes across the version range
• Assessed compatibility with this project's usage and whether any code changes are required
• Treated CI as the primary safety net
• Scaled the review depth to the update's risk
• Chose the verdict from semver risk, changelog findings, and CI status