FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

Enable CONFIG_AMT in 6.6.x by kkroo · Pull Request #4152 · linuxkit/linuxkit · GitHub

Enable CONFIG_AMT in 6.6.x - #4152

Open
kkroo wants to merge 1 commit into
linuxkit:masterfrom
kkroo:master
Open

Enable CONFIG_AMT in 6.6.x#4152
kkroo wants to merge 1 commit into
linuxkit:masterfrom
kkroo:master

Conversation

kkroo commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automatic Multicast Tunneling (RFC7450) in Linux is quite mature now, and of importance for IPTV workflows

- What I did

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

kkroo force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 7e8e840 to 5444f15 Compare July 31, 2025 15:35

deitch commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for this @kkroo. Can you follow the kernel update process here?

kkroo commented Jul 31, 2025
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the quick review, @deitch. Will do and get CI to pass. My intent is to get this into Docker Desktop. Am I in the right place?

deitch commented Jul 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Yes and no. I believe that Docker Desktop uses a derivative of linuxkit for the desktop, but I don't think it is direct. We have some maintainers here from Docker, maybe @djs55 can comment?

kkroo force-pushed the master branch 5 times, most recently from aeac769 to a592991 Compare July 31, 2025 23:26
Signed-off-by: Omar Ramadan <omar@blockcast.net>

kkroo commented Aug 1, 2025
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@deitch I've made the edits to the yaml's by hand, the Makefile in the instructions seems to be broken on OSX. I don't have the permission to push the image to the repo, so Kernel Tests are still failing.

@djs55 keen on your input. Looking at my docker desktop now and its using 6.10.14-linuxkit where is the source for that?

kkroo commented Aug 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bump

deitch commented Aug 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Yeah, we would need to build and push it out. We don't yet have CI set up for that, and it is slow (building kernels).

We don't really like pushing out existing kernels again, as who knows what it can break. Is there a really good reason to do this on 6.6.71? Or can we cut a new version (I think 6.6.102 is the most recent 6.6.x), or even better yet a new series (6.12 has been out for a while, 6.16 just came out)? If you can follow the process there (same doc), I can push it out.

kkroo commented Aug 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

thanks for the response @deitch the goal is to get this upstreamed to docker desktop which is currently using 6.10.14 and introduce as little change as possible (AMT) which should not affect anything else. happy to help prep next kernel version target for docker desktop. should i stick with 6.10.x or is better to use a newer version?

deitch commented Aug 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Just to reiterate, I have zero control over, or even insight into, Docker Desktop's VM image. Actually, I am kind of surprised they used 6.10, given its short life.

The list of kernel versions and their support lifetime is on wikipedia. Given 6.12's long life, I would recommend that.

This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL