In the current version that example has somehow become useless, as it suddenly uses data that is symmetric about 0 anyways. It also lost the warning. There is also an error in the BoundaryNorm section. I suppose that was edited in a hurry and would need to be refurbished anyways.
Activity
ImportanceOfBeingErnest commented on Oct 7, 2018
Actually, there is a tutorial and an example which are almost identical. This issue mostly applies to both of them.
jklymak commented on Oct 7, 2018
#12419 will update those examples. The last statement should have been Z1 - 0.4 * Z2
story645 commented on Dec 4, 2019
Was this closed by #12419?
timhoffm commented on Dec 7, 2019
From the issues mentioned in the original post, it seems more or less solved. @jklymak please confirm. If that's the case we can close this.
I've moved the discussion on tutorial/example similarity to a separate issue #15866.