| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This file was deleted.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
| The SVG and PDF backends can now render hatches with transparency | ||
| ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
|
|
||
| The SVG and PDF backends now respect the hatch stroke alpha. Useful applications | ||
| are, among others, semi-transparent hatches as a subtle way to differentiate | ||
| columns in bar plots. | ||
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityThis could be a nice demo in the gallery, or perhaps another subplot in https://matplotlib.org/3.2.0/gallery/lines_bars_and_markers/filled_step.html
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityCool idea. As a side note, because hatch color/alpha is linked to the Patch's edge's, a simple plot with hatch alpha will usually not look so good because the translucent edge will half-overlap with the fill. One can plot edge-less with lw=0, but to have an opaque outline one must replot a full opacity, edge-only plot on top of the first.
It's a bit hackish. An independent hatch style API (#7059) would go a long way to simplifying this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.