| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Qualitycolormaps know their own name, is that something we want to also check?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityYes, IMHO we should. As we use it now, the name is an integral part of the colormap. Otherwise you can get funny behavior, e.g. with the new colormap registry
And similar.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI don't have a strong opinion either way. I was viewing the == to mean "will these colormaps look the same". If cmocean defines a "Blues1" colormap and it looks suspiciously similar to MPL's "Blues", I may want to check for that equality and not name equality. I do see TIm's point though, so I am fine adding it if that is what is wanted.
I suppose we should also add colorbar_extends too in case someone changed that.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI see the point in "will these colormaps look the same", but as long as we have Colormap.name I think it has to be taken into account for __eq__. You could introduce a Colormap.is_equivalent() for "look the same". OTOH I don't think there is a strong reason a colormap has to know its name, but removing that is hard to justify as well.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityOK, I added in the comparisons for name and colorbar_extend. Also added tests for those two situations.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.