test added.

LGTM, thanks @anntzer

Just wondering, would the spelling seaborn-0.8-bright be better than seaborn0.8-bright?

I mildly prefer without the dash as the dash here is specifying something with in the namespace of seaborn styles and the 0.8 is clarifying that it is the namespace of a particular version of seaborn and we do not plan to pick up style sheets for every version of seaborn.

On the other hand, seaborn-0.8-bright does scan a bit better.

I also propose seaborn08 with no extra punctuation.

There is a vague convention in Fedora that compatibility packages be named <name><version> without other changes (and then subpackages would be <name><version>-<subpackage>), so I have a slight preference for that (i.e., seaborn0.8-bright, etc.)

The python packaging naming convention is seaborn-0.8.tar.gz (https://pypi.org/project/seaborn/#files).

Those are not backwards-compatibility names though; those are <name>-<version>, whereas I mean <name><oldversion> as the name itself.

I don't see (the point of) the distinction, but concerning package compatiblity I'm just a simple user 🤷.