| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityDirectly check the visibility of the tick label as I think that is the most relevant part from xaxis.get_ticks_position() and will prevent the unnecessary calls to xaxis.get_tightbbox mentioned at #26150 (comment). Only checking the first tick is consistent with get_ticks_position.
There is a question in my mind about what happens if the ticks are pointing outward but unlabelled, but I think that could already be an issue with the existing approach as you could have "default" position and outward ticks. Edit: the ticks themselves aren't included in get_tightbbox so actually this makes no difference.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.