| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityNote: I've intentionally written may because in the current implementation one can have scenarios where the limits are respected. For example
fig, ax = plt.subplots() ax.set_aspect('equal', 'datalim') ax.plot([0, 1], [0, 2]) ax.set_ylim(-5, 5)Just looking at the data, the y-range is larger, so to get all data shown on equal aspect, x has to be increased. Thus, new xlims are calculated, but taking the ylim (not the ydata) into account. Whether this behavior of sometimes taking limits into account and sometimes not is desireable, is a separate question that I don't want to discuss. The doc now only states that it may (or may not) happen. Note however, that the added runtime warning is precise: It will be emitted exactly if we change previously fixed limits.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.