FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

docs: drop redundant sustained scenario from single-client retry demo by lesnik512 · Pull Request #112 · modern-python/httpware · GitHub

docs: drop redundant sustained scenario from single-client retry demo - #112

Merged
lesnik512 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
retry-demo-drop-sustained
Jul 19, 2026
Merged

docs: drop redundant sustained scenario from single-client retry demo#112
lesnik512 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
retry-demo-drop-sustained

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The single-client retry demo's Sustained outage scenario showed plain ✗82 vs httpware ✗81 — near-identical, which reads as "no difference" at a glance. That's correct model behavior (retry can't rescue a caller from a sustained outage), but it works against the suite's design where every scenario spotlights a number that pops, and its stop copy overclaimed a "fails fast" that never showed (a budget-exhausted request still hits the backend once and counts as ✗, so the fast-failed counter stays 0).

Rationale + details: planning/changes/2026-07-19.03-drop-single-client-sustained-scenario.md.

Change

  • Remove the sustained scenario from the single-client retry demo, leaving only Brief blip (self-evident win: plain ✗6 vs httpware ✗0).
  • The sustained/amplification story now lives — with numbers that pop (naive ~18× vs httpware ~3×) — in the herd view directly below (shipped in docs: thundering-herd demo view + resilience-demo enrich pass #111).
  • Preserve the "retry rescues blips, not outages" myth-bust as one line of the herd intro; align the bridging prose.

Verification

  • just docs-build --strict clean; just check-planning OK; node --check clean.
  • jsdom harnesses green: verify-demos (retry tour completes on the single blip scenario), verify-herd, verify-real-page.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…ry demo

Retry can't help the caller on a sustained outage, so its counters read
plain ✗82 vs httpware ✗81 — "no difference" at a glance, against the suite's
one-number-that-pops design, and its stop overclaimed a "fails fast" that
never showed (budget-exhausted requests count as ✗, not fast-fail). Keep only
the Brief blip scenario (clear ✗6 vs ✗0 win); the herd view below now owns the
sustained/amplification story with numbers that pop (~18x vs ~3x). Preserve the
"retry rescues blips, not outages" point as one line of the herd intro.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
lesnik512 merged commit 2c72d63 into main Jul 19, 2026
7 checks passed
lesnik512 deleted the retry-demo-drop-sustained branch July 19, 2026 17:30
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL