FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

attempt-backport: unlabel and clean labeling by Fishrock123 · Pull Request #104 · nodejs/github-bot · GitHub

attempt-backport: unlabel and clean labeling - #104

Merged
phillipj merged 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
Fishrock123:attempt-backport-unlabel-and-clean-labeling
Jan 5, 2017
Merged

attempt-backport: unlabel and clean labeling#104
phillipj merged 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
Fishrock123:attempt-backport-unlabel-and-clean-labeling

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Should fix #100 (comment) while also giving a way to see when a PR update has changed the backportability.

This was always on the plans, I just hadn't gotten to it before.

cc @phillipj and maybe also @thealphanerd

I don't really trust myself that it'l work without testing though, but I have a plan on how to test the script, so I'm going to do that next and then rebase this ontop.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Fishrock123 force-pushed the attempt-backport-unlabel-and-clean-labeling branch 2 times, most recently from e25c998 to 9acb63e Compare December 14, 2016 15:03

This comment was marked as off-topic.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Other than my recent negate comments, this LGTM

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@phillipj On second look I think my previous checks were wrong. We only want to remove it if we added it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Fishrock123 not sure I follow you.. If we only want the bot to remove labels it added itself previously, that still means my .includes() comments are valid?

If I understand the current code correctly, labels added by the bot will not be removed since it will prevent removeLabelFromPR() from being reached if the label in question was actually added by the bot.

Fishrock123 force-pushed the attempt-backport-unlabel-and-clean-labeling branch from 9acb63e to a13ed9a Compare January 4, 2017 20:29

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@phillipj You're right. I read it wrong. Updated.

This comment was marked as off-topic.

phillipj merged commit 3f2099d into nodejs:master Jan 5, 2017

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Fishrock123 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2017
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

attempt-backport still does not work Edit: now working?!

2 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL