| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM up to the linter errors CI is showing
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you please add checks also for on('data') and pipe()? Both of those trigger a resume().
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you separate these using block scopes, as done in a lot of other tests. Then, you can reuse the same variable names.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would drop the "First test," "Second test," etc. from the comments. They will likely become out of date as people change the file.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: nodejs#10299 Ref: nodejs#8683 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
Adding test for the resumeScheduled state in stream.Readable
Ref: #8683
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5446/console
cc: @mcollina