deps: backport 75f2d65f00 from upstream V8 - #12535
Closed
hashseed wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval
Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable
resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached
bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior
with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in
the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because
CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo).
This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few
other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration
block scopes.
BUG=chromium:608279
LOG=n
Committed:
https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{nodejs#36046}
Fixes: nodejs#12308
mhdawson
reviewed
Apr 20, 2017
mhdawson
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
cjihrig
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2017
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2017
bnoordhuis
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM but FWIW, I can't get the test to fail with node.js v6.10.2.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
|
Only fails on debug build. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
MylesBorins
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2017
MylesBorins
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rubber Stamp LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
landed in 404d1bc |
Sorry, something went wrong.
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2017
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval
Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable
resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached
bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior
with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in
the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because
CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo).
This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few
other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration
block scopes.
BUG=chromium:608279
LOG=n
Committed:
https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36046}
Fixes: #12308
PR-URL: #12535
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2017
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval
Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable
resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached
bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior
with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in
the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because
CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo).
This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few
other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration
block scopes.
BUG=chromium:608279
LOG=n
Committed:
https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36046}
Fixes: #12308
PR-URL: #12535
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2017
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval
Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable
resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached
bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior
with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in
the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because
CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo).
This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few
other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration
block scopes.
BUG=chromium:608279
LOG=n
Committed:
https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36046}
Fixes: #12308
PR-URL: #12535
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Merged
andrew749
pushed a commit
to michielbaird/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2017
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval
Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable
resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached
bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior
with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in
the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because
CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo).
This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few
other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration
block scopes.
BUG=chromium:608279
LOG=n
Committed:
https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36046}
Fixes: nodejs#12308
PR-URL: nodejs/node#12535
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original commit message:
Don't treat catch scopes as possibly-shadowing for sloppy eval Scope analysis is over-conservative when treating variable resolutions as possibly-shadowed by a sloppy eval. In the attached bug, this comes into play since catch scopes have different behavior with respect to the "calls eval" in eager vs lazy compilation (in the latter, they are never marked as "calls eval" because CatchContexts don't have an associated ScopeInfo). This patch changes the scope-type check to also eliminate a few other cases where shadowing isn't possible, such as non-declaration block scopes. BUG=chromium:608279 LOG=n Committed: https://crrev.com/75f2d65f003ebb22815489e9970913ba37234f1b Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36046}Fixes: #12308
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
deps