FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests by Trott · Pull Request #17466 · nodejs/node · GitHub

/ node Public

test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests - #17466

Closed
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
Trott:less-port
Closed

test: remove hidden use of common.PORT in parallel tests#17466
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
Trott:less-port

Conversation

Trott commented Dec 5, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().
Trott added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 5, 2017

Trott commented Dec 5, 2017
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11882/

(UPDATE: CI is good.)

maclover7 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

LGTM

mhdawson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

LGTM

BridgeAR commented Dec 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This does not require 48 hours as far as I see it

Trott commented Dec 6, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Landed in abd5d95.

Trott closed this Dec 6, 2017
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: nodejs#17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

gibfahn commented Dec 20, 2017
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Should this be backported to v6.x-staging? If yes please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if no let me know or add the dont-land-on label.

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: nodejs#17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

Trott commented Dec 20, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@gibfahn backport in #17771, assigned to you

gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

Backport-PR-URL: #17771
PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
common.hasMultiLocalhost() uses common.PORT under the hood. This is
problematic in parallel tests because another test using port 0 to
get an arbitrary open port may end up getting common.PORT before the
test using common.PORT gets it.

Therefore, change common.PORT to port 0 in common.hasMultiLocalhost().

PR-URL: #17466
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Trott deleted the less-port branch January 13, 2022 22:48
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL