| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
rubber stamp lgtm
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
LGTM, but this will need a non-trivial rebase against #20876 and quick backports against other release lines ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@jasnell It’s labelled tsc-agenda, so I don’t think we can do it before the meeting, but by the end of the week should be doable. (The macOS CI failure over there is real but I’m optimistic about taking care of that.) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Awesome. 🎉 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RSLGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@jasnell This is ready for rebasing now :) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Awesome. Will try to rebase tomorrow |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain.
|
@addaleax ... rebased! PTAL New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/15375/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Some related failures in CI... trying again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/15377/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
One flaky failure in Linux... re-running https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linux/19468/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
And again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/15387/ (Related: Consider approving #21251.) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain. PR-URL: #21105 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
(note... landed this initially without metadata, caught it, then did a quick force push with the metadata... how? you ask, I forgot to node land --amend after rebasing out a squash commit) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@jasnell Have you tried adding -x "node land --amend" to the rebase command? git node should suggest that now, it will add an exec node land --amend line for each commit in the interactive rebase session. Maybe nodejs/node-core-utils#160 could help with that as well |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@jasnell would you be able to backport this to v10.x-staging asap? It probably has to be done from scratch instead of a cherry-pick to avoid sneaking in semver-major changes. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@targos Are you still planning on merging the Worker changes into v10.x in the near future? I think they might have a tiny conflict with one of the patches in the security release – but a big one with this PR (i.e. I’d recommend doing this after the Worker PR – if there are nontrivial merge conflicts, I’m happy to help) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I've already merged everything from master apart from this PR, including de Worker changes |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Will do a backport PR early next week. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Ping. Does anyone want to pick this up? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Ping. Commits that depend on this change are accumulating. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I'll be able to get back on backporting this week. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Super. Thank you! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Backport of nodejs#21105
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain. PR-URL: nodejs#21105 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain. PR-URL: #21105 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Backport-PR-URL: #21799 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain. Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Backport-PR-URL: #21798 PR-URL: #21105
Begin moving `process` object function definitions out of `node.cc` ... continuing the process of making `node.cc` smaller and easier to maintain. Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Backport-PR-URL: #21798 PR-URL: #21105
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Begin moving process object function definitions out of
node.cc ... continuing the process of making node.cc
smaller and easier to maintain.
Checklist