| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
I would like to know the relationship between next and next+1 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
io.js v3.0.0 will be based on what's in this PR (may not come from this PR but it's this list of changes on master), next is where this comes from but next is falling behind master at a rapid rate, hence the change of approach. This means that v3.0.0 will be with V8 v4.4 unless we can't get it done for some reason. next+1 is where some folks are working with V8 v4.5, at the current rate I'd expect that work to form the basis of Node.js v4.0.0. Unfortunately next+1 is going to suffer from the same problem as next in falling behind master. But if you want a playground for V8 v4.5 then you should go there. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
v3.0.0 RC 4 based on this branch: https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/ $ node -pe process.versions
{ http_parser: '2.5.0',
node: '3.0.0-rc.4',
v8: '4.4.63.12',
uv: '1.6.1',
zlib: '1.2.8',
ares: '1.10.1-DEV',
modules: '45',
openssl: '1.0.2d' }
Includes the node-gyp changes for quick header downloads (note how it not only grabs the headers tarball but it also knows this is an RC so it has to go elsewhere for it): $ npm i buffertools
npm http request GET https://registry.npmjs.org/buffertools
npm http 200 https://registry.npmjs.org/buffertools
npm http fetch GET https://registry.npmjs.org/buffertools/-/buffertools-2.1.3.tgz
npm http fetch 200 https://registry.npmjs.org/buffertools/-/buffertools-2.1.3.tgz
npm WARN engine buffertools@2.1.3: wanted: {"node":">=0.3.0"} (current: {"node":"3.0.0-rc.4","npm":"2.13.1"})
> buffertools@2.1.3 install /home/rvagg/git/iojs/io.js/node_modules/buffertools
> node-gyp rebuild
gyp http GET https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/iojs-v3.0.0-rc.4-headers.tar.gz
gyp http 200 https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/iojs-v3.0.0-rc.4-headers.tar.gz
gyp http GET https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/SHASUMS256.txt
gyp http 200 https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/SHASUMS256.txt
make: Entering directory '/home/rvagg/git/iojs/io.js/node_modules/buffertools/build'
CXX(target) Release/obj.target/buffertools/buffertools.o
SOLINK_MODULE(target) Release/obj.target/buffertools.node
COPY Release/buffertools.node
make: Leaving directory '/home/rvagg/git/iojs/io.js/node_modules/buffertools/build'
buffertools@2.1.3 node_modules/buffertools
It also includes the process.release changes which will be used for further modifications to node-gyp which should be upstreamed if all goes well. $ node -pe process.release
{ name: 'io.js',
sourceUrl: 'https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/iojs-v3.0.0-rc.4.tar.gz',
headersUrl: 'https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.4/iojs-v3.0.0-rc.4-headers.tar.gz' }
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Huge +1 for process.release |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@rvagg I'm a little bit confused with what the difference between the next and this branch is and why it would be easier to merge master onto this branch and then cherry-pick from next rather than merging master onto next. Going forward, should V8 upgrades (like the latest one in #2220) continue going into next? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@ofrobots this: $ git diff v3.0.0-alpha next --stat | tail -1 695 files changed, 13678 insertions(+), 18437 deletions(-) Granted a lot of that is npm, but getting out release candidates from a next branch that is so far behind master is a pain and lacks legitimacy. This is just my attempt at resetting so we have a path to getting it out. I was rightly scolded in the TSC call today for my willingness to rebase given the pain this causes for anyone else working on the same branch, but we're starting to converge on a better process for keeping all of these things up to date. 3.0.0 is just a hump we have to get over now! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Okay, I see. Going forward I can volunteer some time to try and keep next and next+1 up-to-date with master. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Hi all, could you tell me when will iojs v3.0.0 release? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Soon™ -- Literally when it's ready. Most of everything is done now, we had to wait for NAN to catch up for native addons to be reasonable. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Me too post. I've been a little overcommitted recently but I'll have more time again starting next week. I missed the discussion on yesterday's TSC call. Is the plan to merge master frequently into next and next+1 (or master into next and next into next+1)? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@bnoordhuis will you possibly be able to make it to #2230? The generally discussion has shifted a bit. Turns out things like bisect and blame don't work so well with the previous proposed approach. See also: https://gist.github.com/trevnorris/7620a64b086e95271197 and #2215 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
I think I can make that. I'll try to. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Great work 👏 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
#2193 should probably included too, according to #2193 (comment) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@YuriSolovyov everything in 2.x will be included. Don't worry. :) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
There have been additional bug fixes (e.g. 9cf36a1). Will these be taken into the v3.0.0 release, or done after in a 3.0.1? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Can we expect Chrome's ES6 features in v3? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@AntouanK probably not, because Chrome 45 is still in beta and v3 will be released with the V8 version of Chrome 44. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@AntouanK v3.x will ship with V8 4.4, the same version of V8 that's in Chrome 44. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Updated to latest master, included additional items in next that were not in here, performed a diff against a next + master merged and found some rebase problems that I've fixed, also discovered that the commit for #1961 hasn't been pulled in to next yet. Merged in #2275 and #2247 prior to cutting a v3.0.0-rc.6 which is now available in https://iojs.org/download/rc/v3.0.0-rc.6/ - @fhemberger would you mind testing both Windows installers? I haven't tried them but they appear to have been generated successfully. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #2096 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
* adds missing HTTP status codes * corrects those with a wrong description * the falsely included codes have been kept PR-URL: #1470 Reviewed-By: Brendan Ashworth <brendan.ashworth@me.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #2154 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
PR-URL: #2171 Reviewed-By: Alexis Campailla <alexis@janeasystems.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu>
These are the core changes that allow pLinux BE/LE compile. They don't include all of the changes needed for AIX which will follow once we have pLinux up and running in the builds PR-URL: #2124 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <ben@strongloop.com> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergstrom <bugs@bergstroem.nu>
The new implementation of Buffer missed the check for null/undefined as the first argument to new Buffer(). Reintroduce the check and add test. Fix: e8734c0 "buffer: implement Uint8Array backed Buffer" Fix: #2194 PR-URL: #2195 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Accidentally left when upgrading to V8 4.4.63.9 PR-URL: #2275 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
PR-URL: #2247 Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
If tab completion is not being used, allow user to enter tab characters. PR-URL: #1761 Reviewed-By: Brendan Ashworth <brendan.ashworth@me.com>
This commit fixes agent.getName(), which returned an extra colon according to the docs, and adds tests (it was previously not unit tested). PR-URL: #1617 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Includes cherry-picks for: * JitCodeEvent patch: https://crrev.com/f7969b1d5a55e66237221a463daf422ac7611788 * argparse patch: https://crrev.com/44bc918458481d60b08d5566f0f31a79e39b85d7 PR-URL: #2220 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <ofrobots@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
A bug on ARMv6 makes the process crash when the V8 debugger is used. Disabling vector ICs as a workaround. V8-Bug: https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4338 PR-URL: #2220 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <ofrobots@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
|
thanks @mzgol, have amended the changelog |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #2224 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
PR-URL: #2224 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Makes the REPL persistently save history by default to ~/.node_repl_history when in terminal mode. This can be disabled by setting NODE_REPL_HISTORY="". PR-URL: #2224 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Persists the REPL history in plain text using the new NODE_REPL_HISTORY environment variable. Deprecates NODE_REPL_HISTORY_FILE. The REPL will notify the user and automatically convert the history to the new format if files are specified. PR-URL: #2224 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <mic.besace@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Notable changes:
|
https://jenkins-iojs.nodesource.com/job/node-test-commit/102/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
I'm tackling this 3.0.0 problem from a different angle, I'm sick of producing "RC" builds from a next branch that is so far behind master, meaning they are nothing like "release candidates" and catching up is next to impossible.
This branch, on nodejs/io.js so others can contribute, is the current master with changes from next cherry-picked in and I'm just going to rebase to keep it up to date and it's mergable if we decide to go that way (I'm leaning that way currently fwiw).
I made a branch-diff tool that's like doing git log b1..b2 but not as strict and uses our PR-URL metadata to help with matches. This was mainly to help identify what to cherry-pick. It also prints out changelog-maker output so I can also do this: