[v10.x] src: refactor options parsing - #22558
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is a major refactor of our Node’s parser. See `node_options.cc`
for how it is used, and `node_options-inl.h` for the bulk
of its implementation.
Unfortunately, the implementation has come to have some
complexity, in order to meet the following goals:
- Make it easy to *use* for defining or changing options.
- Keep it (mostly) backwards-compatible.
- No tests were harmed as part of this commit.
- Be as consistent as possible.
- In particular, options can now generally accept arguments
through both `--foo=bar` notation and `--foo bar` notation.
We were previously very inconsistent on this point.
- Separate into different levels of scope, namely
per-process (global), per-Isolate and per-Environment
(+ debug options).
- Allow programmatic accessibility in the future.
- This includes a possible expansion for `--help` output.
This commit also leaves a number of `TODO` comments, mostly for
improving consistency even more (possibly with having to modify
tests), improving embedder support, as well as removing pieces of
exposed configuration variables that should never have become
part of the public API but unfortunately are at this point.
PR-URL: nodejs#22392
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
|
@addaleax build started: https://ci.nodejs.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/detail/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/708/pipeline |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/16820/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
targos
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2018
danbev
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2018
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2018
This is a major refactor of our Node’s parser. See `node_options.cc`
for how it is used, and `node_options-inl.h` for the bulk
of its implementation.
Unfortunately, the implementation has come to have some
complexity, in order to meet the following goals:
- Make it easy to *use* for defining or changing options.
- Keep it (mostly) backwards-compatible.
- No tests were harmed as part of this commit.
- Be as consistent as possible.
- In particular, options can now generally accept arguments
through both `--foo=bar` notation and `--foo bar` notation.
We were previously very inconsistent on this point.
- Separate into different levels of scope, namely
per-process (global), per-Isolate and per-Environment
(+ debug options).
- Allow programmatic accessibility in the future.
- This includes a possible expansion for `--help` output.
This commit also leaves a number of `TODO` comments, mostly for
improving consistency even more (possibly with having to modify
tests), improving embedder support, as well as removing pieces of
exposed configuration variables that should never have become
part of the public API but unfortunately are at this point.
PR-URL: #22392
Backport-PR-URL: #22558
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2018
This is a major refactor of our Node’s parser. See `node_options.cc`
for how it is used, and `node_options-inl.h` for the bulk
of its implementation.
Unfortunately, the implementation has come to have some
complexity, in order to meet the following goals:
- Make it easy to *use* for defining or changing options.
- Keep it (mostly) backwards-compatible.
- No tests were harmed as part of this commit.
- Be as consistent as possible.
- In particular, options can now generally accept arguments
through both `--foo=bar` notation and `--foo bar` notation.
We were previously very inconsistent on this point.
- Separate into different levels of scope, namely
per-process (global), per-Isolate and per-Environment
(+ debug options).
- Allow programmatic accessibility in the future.
- This includes a possible expansion for `--help` output.
This commit also leaves a number of `TODO` comments, mostly for
improving consistency even more (possibly with having to modify
tests), improving embedder support, as well as removing pieces of
exposed configuration variables that should never have become
part of the public API but unfortunately are at this point.
PR-URL: #22392
Backport-PR-URL: #22558
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2018
This is a major refactor of our Node’s parser. See `node_options.cc`
for how it is used, and `node_options-inl.h` for the bulk
of its implementation.
Unfortunately, the implementation has come to have some
complexity, in order to meet the following goals:
- Make it easy to *use* for defining or changing options.
- Keep it (mostly) backwards-compatible.
- No tests were harmed as part of this commit.
- Be as consistent as possible.
- In particular, options can now generally accept arguments
through both `--foo=bar` notation and `--foo bar` notation.
We were previously very inconsistent on this point.
- Separate into different levels of scope, namely
per-process (global), per-Isolate and per-Environment
(+ debug options).
- Allow programmatic accessibility in the future.
- This includes a possible expansion for `--help` output.
This commit also leaves a number of `TODO` comments, mostly for
improving consistency even more (possibly with having to modify
tests), improving embedder support, as well as removing pieces of
exposed configuration variables that should never have become
part of the public API but unfortunately are at this point.
PR-URL: #22392
Backport-PR-URL: #22558
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of #22392, the only two merge conflicts being
A few commits depend on this (or fix this up, but apply cleanly), so this would be good to get landed soon (read: please approve 😉).