tls: do not free cert in .getCertificate() - #25490
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
The documentation of `SSL_get_certificate` states that it returns an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller. Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect. Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3 Refs: nodejs#24261 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/217
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
|
@addaleax sadly an error occured when I tried to trigger a build :( |
Sorry, something went wrong.
4 tasks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
Sorry, something went wrong.
danbev
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
cjihrig
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
sam-github
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
Sorry, something went wrong.
lpinca
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2019
This was referenced Jan 16, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
|
Resume CI again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/20229/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2019
The documentation of `SSL_get_certificate` states that it returns an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller. Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect. Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3 Refs: #24261 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/217 PR-URL: #25490 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2019
The documentation of `SSL_get_certificate` states that it returns an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller. Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect. Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3 Refs: #24261 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/217 PR-URL: #25490 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Merged
zcbenz
pushed a commit
to electron/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2019
The documentation of `SSL_get_certificate` states that it returns an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller. Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect. Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3 Refs: nodejs/node#24261 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/217 PR-URL: nodejs/node#25490 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
sam-github
pushed a commit
to sam-github/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2019
The documentation of `SSL_get_certificate` states that it returns an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller. Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect. Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3 Refs: nodejs#24261 Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/217 PR-URL: nodejs#25490 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This was referenced Aug 9, 2020
This was referenced Aug 10, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation of SSL_get_certificate states that it returns
an internal pointer that must not be freed by the caller.
Therefore, using a smart pointer to take ownership is incorrect.
Refs: https://man.openbsd.org/SSL_get_certificate.3
Refs: #24261
Checklist