FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

fs: document the Date conversion in Stats objects by joyeecheung · Pull Request #28224 · nodejs/node · GitHub

/ node Public

fs: document the Date conversion in Stats objects - #28224

Closed
joyeecheung wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
joyeecheung:fs-stats
Closed

fs: document the Date conversion in Stats objects#28224
joyeecheung wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
joyeecheung:fs-stats

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.

The comment was previously lost in a revert.

Refs: ae6c704

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.

The comment was previously lost in a revert.

Refs: nodejs@ae6c704

nodejs-github-bot commented Jun 14, 2019
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Sadly, an error occurred when I tried to trigger a build. :(
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/23877/

nodejs-github-bot added the fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. label Jun 14, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc @nodejs/fs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc'ing people who reverted the original commit @addaleax @TimothyGu @refack @cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. label Jun 17, 2019
Comment thread lib/internal/fs/utils.js Outdated

Trott left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality

LGTM with or without small typo in comment fixed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2019
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.

The comment was previously lost in a revert.

Refs: nodejs@ae6c704

PR-URL: nodejs#28224
Refs: nodejs@ae6c704
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in b6326ce 🎉

BridgeAR closed this Jun 17, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2019
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.

The comment was previously lost in a revert.

Refs: ae6c704

PR-URL: #28224
Refs: ae6c704
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2019
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.

The comment was previously lost in a revert.

Refs: ae6c704

PR-URL: #28224
Refs: ae6c704
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Sep 3, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL