| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp in Numbers + 0.5. The comment was previously lost in a revert. Refs: nodejs@ae6c704
|
Sadly, an error occurred when I tried to trigger a build. :( |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
cc @nodejs/fs |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
cc'ing people who reverted the original commit @addaleax @TimothyGu @refack @cjihrig |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with or without small typo in comment fixed.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp in Numbers + 0.5. The comment was previously lost in a revert. Refs: nodejs@ae6c704 PR-URL: nodejs#28224 Refs: nodejs@ae6c704 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp in Numbers + 0.5. The comment was previously lost in a revert. Refs: ae6c704 PR-URL: #28224 Refs: ae6c704 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp in Numbers + 0.5. The comment was previously lost in a revert. Refs: ae6c704 PR-URL: #28224 Refs: ae6c704 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Document why the dates are calculated with the timestamp
in Numbers + 0.5.
The comment was previously lost in a revert.
Refs: ae6c704
Checklist