src: simplify UnionBytes - #29116
Closed
bnoordhuis wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Before this commit it was using a tagged union to store the one-byte and two-byte pointers. From a `sizeof(UnionBytes)` perspective that makes no difference - there is a hole between the tag and the union - and it makes the code just a little harder to reason about, IMO.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
addaleax
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2019
cjihrig
approved these changes
Aug 14, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
jasnell
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2019
Trott
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2019
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2019
Before this commit it was using a tagged union to store the one-byte and two-byte pointers. From a `sizeof(UnionBytes)` perspective that makes no difference - there is a hole between the tag and the union - and it makes the code just a little harder to reason about, IMO. PR-URL: #29116 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2019
Before this commit it was using a tagged union to store the one-byte and two-byte pointers. From a `sizeof(UnionBytes)` perspective that makes no difference - there is a hole between the tag and the union - and it makes the code just a little harder to reason about, IMO. PR-URL: #29116 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
This was referenced Aug 20, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before this commit it was using a tagged union to store the one-byte and
two-byte pointers.
From a sizeof(UnionBytes) perspective that makes no difference - there
is a hole between the tag and the union - and it makes the code just a
little harder to reason about, IMO.