async_hooks: proper handling for AH in runInAsyncScope - #30965
Closed
apapirovski wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
async_hooks: proper handling for AH in runInAsyncScope#30965apapirovski wants to merge 1 commit into
apapirovski wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error, the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
addaleax
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2019
Trott
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2019
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 15, 2019
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2019
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error, the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover. PR-URL: #30965 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2019
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error, the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover. PR-URL: #30965 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error, the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover. PR-URL: #30965 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error, the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover. PR-URL: #30965 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
3 tasks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
This seems to have broken some things, more specifically it seems related to #31783. I'm reverting it from v12.x and we should reland when the fix has been on current and the reported bugs are fixed |
Sorry, something went wrong.
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2020
The exception handler user-defined will not automatically emit after for the async resource. Also removes a duplicated case `test-emit-after-uncaught-exception-runInAsyncScope.js` which is identical to test-emit-after-uncaught-exception.js. Refs: #30965 PR-URL: #31784 Fixes: #31783 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2020
The exception handler user-defined will not automatically emit after for the async resource. Also removes a duplicated case `test-emit-after-uncaught-exception-runInAsyncScope.js` which is identical to test-emit-after-uncaught-exception.js. Refs: #30965 PR-URL: #31784 Fixes: #31783 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
The exception handler user-defined will not automatically emit after for the async resource. Also removes a duplicated case `test-emit-after-uncaught-exception-runInAsyncScope.js` which is identical to test-emit-after-uncaught-exception.js. Refs: #30965 PR-URL: #31784 Fixes: #31783 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We should never try to manually run emitAfter in case of an error,
the exception handler will do it for us, if we're going to recover.
This PR expands on the fix in #30087
Checklist