| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place.
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread.
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests).
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/31271/ (:yellow_heart:) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
This is surprising, reading 13c5a16 I don't understand why it causes the test behavior change. (The changes themselves in this PR look fine although I also don't understand why CancelTerminateExecution is needed) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…raction Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Me neither, really.
Yeah, me neither. I think the reason that V8 aborts here is that some TryCatch catches the termination exception and doesn’t properly clean up after itself, but that seems weird too. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: nodejs#33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
worker: call CancelTerminateExecution() before exiting Locker
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t
quite understand why it is happening in the first place.
async_hooks: clear async_id_stack for terminations in more places
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they
should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks
will be brought to completion when execution terminates.
Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when
the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check
was in place for the case that the termination occurred during
microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for
microtasks and the nextTick queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix
a crash, but still makes sense conceptually.
The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads
to also applying on the main thread, and setting the failed_ flag
rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++
Stop(env) API can have the same effect as worker thread termination,
but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread.
test: regression tests for async_hooks + Promise + Worker interaction
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled
inside a Worker thread and process.exit() is called during the
async part of an async function.
This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all
crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s
surprising that the presence of a statement after process.exit()
in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being
exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the
circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests
can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they
should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests).
Checklist