| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to nodejs#33929.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in d3d4ace |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation. Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section. I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments. This is a follow-up to #33929. PR-URL: #34050 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Some of the SSL_OP_* constants are missing description in the documentation.
Instead of rewriting the description from OpenSSL's wiki, I have decided to put
a link to a detailed list in the 'OpenSSL Options' section.
I see no point of doing both - adding a reference to the wiki and adding
constant descriptions - but I might do if presented with convincing arguments.
This is a follow-up to #33929.