FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

src: use correct microtask queue for checkpoints by addaleax · Pull Request #36581 · nodejs/node · GitHub

/ node Public

src: use correct microtask queue for checkpoints - #36581

Closed
addaleax wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
addaleax:outer-microtask-queue-2
Closed

src: use correct microtask queue for checkpoints#36581
addaleax wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:masterfrom
addaleax:outer-microtask-queue-2

Conversation

addaleax commented Dec 19, 2020
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: nodejs#36482
addaleax added the embedding Issues and PRs related to embedding Node.js in another project. label Dec 19, 2020
nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Dec 19, 2020
addaleax added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 19, 2020
github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 19, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. label Dec 21, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Landed in 2070d5b

addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

PR-URL: #36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
addaleax closed this Dec 21, 2020
addaleax deleted the outer-microtask-queue-2 branch December 21, 2020 12:29
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2020
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: #36482

PR-URL: #36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request May 23, 2021
I missed in c6c8337 that we should not just use that queue for
enqueuing microtasks, but also for running them.

Refs: nodejs#36482

PR-URL: nodejs#36581
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no outstanding review comments, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. embedding Issues and PRs related to embedding Node.js in another project.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL