| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I might be telling you something you already know, but in the past, we've used for rather than .forEach() for performance purposes. I don't think either of these are hot paths, so it's probably fine. @nodejs/wasi
Sorry, something went wrong.
I'm running benchmarks on my other PRs with changes similar to this one, so far I haven't hit an perf issue. My guess is that both approaches are equivalent, but we can use a for(;;) loop instead if we find out that .forEach() is less efficient. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: nodejs#36724 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #36724 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #36724 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #36724 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #36724 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Checklist