[v14.x] fs: remove custom Buffer pool for streams - #38397
Closed
targos wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable. Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable. Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers, just remove the pooling logic. Refs: nodejs#33880 (comment) Fixes: nodejs#31733 PR-URL: nodejs#33981 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
ronag
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2021
benjamingr
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2021
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
danielleadams
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2021
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2021
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable. Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable. Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers, just remove the pooling logic. Refs: #33880 (comment) Fixes: #31733 PR-URL: #33981 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2021
Refs: https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/tag/release-69-1 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 PR-URL: #38178 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2021
Refs: https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/tag/release-69-1 Backport-PR-URL: #38397 PR-URL: #38178 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The performance benefit of using a custom pool are negligable.
Furthermore, it causes problems with Workers and transferrable.
Rather than further adding complexity for compat with Workers,
just remove the pooling logic.
Refs: #33880 (comment)
Fixes: #31733
PR-URL: #33981