doc: use Object.hasOwn() in util doc - #41780
Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit intoJan 31, 2022
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
Fast-track has been requested by @Trott. Please 👍 to approve. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Swtich from `hasOwnProperty()` to `Object.hasOwn()`.
Mesteery
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2022
benjamingr
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2022
benjamingr
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm going to assume this is for the eslint rule to run on the docs?
Sorry, something went wrong.
aduh95
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2022
ruyadorno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2022
Swtich from `hasOwnProperty()` to `Object.hasOwn()`. PR-URL: #41780 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2022
Swtich from `hasOwnProperty()` to `Object.hasOwn()`. PR-URL: #41780 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2022
Swtich from `hasOwnProperty()` to `Object.hasOwn()`. PR-URL: #41780 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2022
Swtich from `hasOwnProperty()` to `Object.hasOwn()`. PR-URL: #41780 Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Swtich from hasOwnProperty() to Object.hasOwn().