[v17.x backport] fs: fix write methods param validation and docs - #42631
Closed
aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[v17.x backport] fs: fix write methods param validation and docs#42631aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
aduh95 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
The FS docs wrongfully indicated support for passing object with an own `toString` function property to `FileHandle.prototype.appendFile`, `FileHandle.prototype.writeFile`, `FileHandle.prototype.write`, `fsPromises.writeFile`, and `fs.writeSync`. This commit fixes that, and adds some test to ensure the actual behavior is aligned with the docs. It also fixes a bug that makes the process crash if a non-buffer object was passed to `FileHandle.prototype.write`. Refs: nodejs#34993 PR-URL: nodejs#41677 Refs: nodejs#41666 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
juanarbol
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
juanarbol
left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
BethGriggs
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
juanarbol
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2022
The FS docs wrongfully indicated support for passing object with an own `toString` function property to `FileHandle.prototype.appendFile`, `FileHandle.prototype.writeFile`, `FileHandle.prototype.write`, `fsPromises.writeFile`, and `fs.writeSync`. This commit fixes that, and adds some test to ensure the actual behavior is aligned with the docs. It also fixes a bug that makes the process crash if a non-buffer object was passed to `FileHandle.prototype.write`. Refs: #34993 PR-URL: #41677 Backport-PR-URL: #42631 Refs: #41666 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
This was referenced Apr 8, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #41677.
/cc @juanarbol in case it's still time to pull it to v17.9.0.