| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type.
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
Sorry, something went wrong.
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: #42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
The method might be designed to explicitly take `options`. However, the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter of a function type. PR-URL: nodejs/node#42832 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Nagy <ronagy@icloud.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Mestery <mestery@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
The method might be designed to explicitly take options. However,
the implementation and many examples already allow the first parameter
of function type. (This is maybe because of Compatibility API.)
node/lib/internal/http2/core.js
Lines 3316 to 3321 in eeb27c2
I'm not sure whether applying the same to http2.createSecureServer is
meaningful. But, seeing https.createServer, the options parameter is
handled as optional.