| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Rebased ↪️ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #43607 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: #43607 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: #43607 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: #43607 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: nodejs/node#43607 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Hey 👋
Context
The diagnostic working group currently works on an initiative to re-evaluate the diagnostic tooling list and its maturity.
Updated
In the previous instance, we examined the case of the Windows xperf module: issue link.
As anyone in the instance has an idea about a potential usage in the field, we decided to remove it. As said in the previous PRs, we prefer to have a list that contains fewer items but is trustable.
But in case you have a different opinion, please share your thoughts in this PR 🙏.
Discuss
As usual, feel free to share your thoughts on that and your experience with this tool.
With love ❤️
cc @nodejs/diagnostics