| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
Sorry, something went wrong.
Failed to start CI- Validating Jenkins credentials ✖ Jenkins credentials invalidhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/4142770062 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I wonder if we could also use the V8 fast calls to improve the underlying byteLengthUtf8() call. That might even improve the situation further, if it's possible? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
We already have an ongoing discussion regarding this over at the performance repo. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Here is the link, nodejs/performance#52. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Commit Queue failed- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/46601 ✔ Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/46601 ----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------ Title http: correctly calculate strict content length (#46601) Author Robert Nagy (@ronag) Branch ronag:http-byte-len -> nodejs:main Labels http, author ready Commits 11 - http: correctly calculate strict content length - http: speedup strict content length - http: make sure to pass encoding to Buffer.byteLength - http: count writtenBytes even if socket is not ready - fixup! http: speedup strict content length - fixup! http: speedup strict content length - fixuP - fixuP - fixup - fixup: linting - fixup: cleanup Committers 1 - Robert Nagy PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46601 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli ------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46601 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ⚠ Commits were pushed since the last review: ⚠ - fixup: linting ⚠ - fixup: cleanup ℹ This PR was created on Fri, 10 Feb 2023 07:55:18 GMT ✔ Approvals: 3 ✔ - Matteo Collina (@mcollina) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46601#pullrequestreview-1302089257 ✔ - Paolo Insogna (@ShogunPanda): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46601#pullrequestreview-1292827320 ✔ - Yagiz Nizipli (@anonrig): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/46601#pullrequestreview-1300561862 ✖ Last GitHub CI failed ℹ Last Full PR CI on 2023-02-17T10:01:39Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/49619/ - Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/49619/ ✔ Last Jenkins CI successful -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ✔ Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncuhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/4234920191 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
still LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
Commit Queue failed{"message":"Base branch was modified. Review and try the merge again.","documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#merge-a-pull-request"}https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/4251305015
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixes some logical errors related to strict content length. Also, previously Buffer.byteLength (which is slow) was run regardless of whether or not the len was required. PR-URL: #46601 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Fixes some logical errors related to strict content length. Also, previously Buffer.byteLength (which is slow) was run regardless of whether or not the len was required. PR-URL: #46601 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Previously Buffer.byteLength (which is slow) was run regardless of whether or not the len was required.