| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@anonrig This seems to make the wpt_tests fail. How is that possible? This PR should not change the result of the code. It is a very narrow change. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
It might be flaky tests. I'll re-run the test suite. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
It works now!!! And I did not change the code. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #47524 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #47524 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#47524 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
It is slightly better to use static constexpr std::string_view compared to static const std::string_view. See https://lemire.me/blog/2023/04/12/consider-using-constexpr-static-function-variables-for-performance/ for details.
It is a micro-optimization: you are unlikely to be able to measure the difference, but it should generate less bloat.