| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The `process.ref(...)` and `process.unref(...)` methods are intended to replace the use of `ref()` and `unref()` methods defined directly on individual API objects. The existing `ref()` and `unref()` methods will be marked as legacy and won't be removed but new APIs should use `process.ref()` and `process.unref()` instead. Refs: nodejs#53266 PR-URL: nodejs#56400 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
PR-URL: nodejs#56517 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#56552 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#56571 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
The `process.ref(...)` and `process.unref(...)` methods are intended to replace the use of `ref()` and `unref()` methods defined directly on individual API objects. The existing `ref()` and `unref()` methods will be marked as legacy and won't be removed but new APIs should use `process.ref()` and `process.unref()` instead. Refs: #53266 PR-URL: #56400 Backport-PR-URL: #56571 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Backport of: