| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #60120 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.45% 88.48% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 703 703
Lines 207826 207822 -4
Branches 40030 40027 -3
==========================================
+ Hits 183842 183889 +47
+ Misses 15973 15940 -33
+ Partials 8011 7993 -18
... and 55 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sorry, something went wrong.
PR-URL: #60120 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: #60120 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
PR-URL: #60120 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
emitDestroy already checks these now:
node/lib/internal/async_hooks.js
Lines 533 to 538 in 6f941fc
We are essentially checking the same condition twice
Also the invalid id check didn't cover undefined. I don't know if it was intentional, but in any case, since #56966, which removed enroll, I'm not sure if we can have an undefined asyncId anyway