stream: Fix readableState.awaitDrain mechanism - #6023
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
addaleax
force-pushed
the
fix-readablestate-awaitdrain
branch
from
138b59d to
4b07c8f
Compare
April 2, 2016 22:38
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
Comment thread
lib/_stream_readable.js
Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't .includes() for strings and not arrays? If I'm right, that means the included test isn't failing like it should?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It’s from ES2016, but it does what you think it does, i.e. [1, 2, 3].includes(2) === true. I like the clarity of it, but if you’d rather stick with .indexOf(…), I’d definitely understand that.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we'd need .indexOf() if we're backporting to v4.x/v5.x anyway.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mscdex You’re right, sorry. Updated this PR with indexOf.
Sorry, something went wrong.
In 6899094 (nodejs#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: nodejs#5820
addaleax
force-pushed
the
fix-readablestate-awaitdrain
branch
from
4b07c8f to
21f7246
Compare
April 3, 2016 13:31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
LGTM. CI once more: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2142/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
CI failure looks unrelated. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
LGTM |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
LGTM |
Sorry, something went wrong.
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Closed
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request check-list
Please make sure to review and check all of these items:
this change (including linting)?
test (or a benchmark) included?
existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
Affected core subsystem(s)
stream
Description of change
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing readableState.awaitDrain when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving readableState.awaitDrain with a constant value of 0.
This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which .write() returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch.
Fixes: #5820
/cc @mscdex