| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
The removes the possiblity for a PR to drop from the queue if the CQ job is cancelled (or times out) in the middle of handling a PR. This increases the window for two concurrent CQ jobs to pick up the same PR, but that's an unlikely scenario. Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
We set a GHA concurrency token, so I think this should be safe! |
Sorry, something went wrong.
The removes the possiblity for a PR to drop from the queue if the CQ job is cancelled (or times out) in the middle of handling a PR. This increases the window for two concurrent CQ jobs to pick up the same PR, but that's an unlikely scenario. Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> PR-URL: #65101 Refs: #64972 Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
The removes the possiblity for a PR to drop from the queue if the CQ job is cancelled (or times out) in the middle of handling a PR. This increases the window for two concurrent CQ jobs to pick up the same PR, but that's an unlikely scenario. Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> PR-URL: #65101 Refs: #64972 Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
The removes the possiblity for a PR to drop from the queue if the CQ job is cancelled (or times out) in the middle of handling a PR. This increases the window for two concurrent CQ jobs to pick up the same PR, but that's an unlikely scenario.
Alternative to #65005
Refs: #64972