| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Signed-off-by: avivkeller <me@aviv.sh>
|
Review requested:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
We don't have benchmarks for this yet, but a local fixture took 0.93s (after) vs 1.16s (before). Not sure if the speedup is worth the "hackiness" of JSON manipulations in this PR. (I'll fix the errors after a round of feedback) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is 70.99237% with 38 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #65371 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.13% 90.12% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 752 752
Lines 251872 251981 +109
Branches 47359 47388 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 227033 227108 +75
- Misses 16167 16187 +20
- Partials 8672 8686 +14
... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On the JS side - LGTM.
I can't really say much about the src/ though 🙂
Sorry, something went wrong.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
By omitting the values we know will not be needed for test coverage from being serialized/deserialized, we can save time during coverage reporting.
We know that:
So, we omit on those cases.