FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending |
URL:
| Home
Tools: [Download Repo ZIP]   [Original HTTPS Page]

governance: simplified pure consensus seeking by mikeal · Pull Request #677 · nodejs/node · GitHub

Repository navigation

governance: simplified pure consensus seeking - #677

Closed
mikeal wants to merge 1 commit into
v1.xfrom
only-consensus-seeking
Closed

mikeal wants to merge 1 commit into
v1.xfrom
only-consensus-seeking

Conversation

mikeal commented Jan 31, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We should remove special cases where we break from consensus seeking in favor of pure consensus.

The reason the process has worked so well is the incentive to convince your peers which is not present in pure consensus. Breaking from it seems dangerous.

mikeal commented Jan 31, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

If accepted we should also update the copied text for working groups in #599

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

2 similar comments

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+1

cjihrig commented Feb 3, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1.

indutny commented Feb 3, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+1

mikeal commented Feb 3, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

That's a majority, and we've had a long time for comment, can a TC member merge please :)

mikeal added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2015
This changes TC addition to a standard TC motion instead
of requiring unanimous consent of all members.

PR-URL: #677
Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merged in 8ac8b76.

This was referenced Jul 6, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants


Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL