test: make test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks more reliable - #9241
Merged
bnoordhuis merged 2 commits intoOct 24, 2016
Merged
test: make test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks more reliable#9241bnoordhuis merged 2 commits into
bnoordhuis merged 2 commits into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
cjihrig
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2016
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/5731/ LGTM if this makes the test less flaky |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
Oh wait, I suppose this test won't actually get run in CI now that it's part of pummel. Anyway, LGTM. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
|
Unfortunate that this won't be run regularly. We'll just need to be vigilant about running the test manually whenever there's a change that could impact this. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
jasnell
approved these changes
Oct 22, 2016
Move sequential/test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks to test/pummel because it fails for me locally quite frequently and because it takes about five or six seconds to complete, which is too long for a test in test/sequential. Fixes: nodejs#8744 PR-URL: nodejs#9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
Increase the number of iterations from 1e4 to 1e5. Makes the test pass for me locally when previously it would fail 9 out of 10 times because the running time was not enough to smooth away the outliers. Fixes: nodejs#8744 PR-URL: nodejs#9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2016
Move sequential/test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks to test/pummel because it fails for me locally quite frequently and because it takes about five or six seconds to complete, which is too long for a test in test/sequential. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2016
Increase the number of iterations from 1e4 to 1e5. Makes the test pass for me locally when previously it would fail 9 out of 10 times because the running time was not enough to smooth away the outliers. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2016
Move sequential/test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks to test/pummel because it fails for me locally quite frequently and because it takes about five or six seconds to complete, which is too long for a test in test/sequential. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2016
Increase the number of iterations from 1e4 to 1e5. Makes the test pass for me locally when previously it would fail 9 out of 10 times because the running time was not enough to smooth away the outliers. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2016
Move sequential/test-crypto-timing-safe-equal-benchmarks to test/pummel because it fails for me locally quite frequently and because it takes about five or six seconds to complete, which is too long for a test in test/sequential. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2016
Increase the number of iterations from 1e4 to 1e5. Makes the test pass for me locally when previously it would fail 9 out of 10 times because the running time was not enough to smooth away the outliers. Fixes: #8744 PR-URL: #9241 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: not-an-aardvark <not-an-aardvark@users.noreply.github.com>
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
R=@not-an-aardvark?