Thanks for the pull request, @jacobo-dominguez-wgu!

This repository is currently maintained by @bradenmacdonald.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.03%. Comparing base (87cba01) to head (3bb0615).

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #3250    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   96.03%   96.03%            
========================================
  Files        1407     1407            
  Lines       34287    34302    +15     
  Branches     7882     8157   +275     
========================================
+ Hits        32928    32943    +15     
  Misses       1318     1318            
  Partials       41       41            

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Hi @jacobo-dominguez-wgu, thanks for handling this! I was testing it and everything works great for subsections and units. However, if I select a course section without Highlights, the 'Add Highlights' button remains enabled for Course Auditors

Can we fix this?

Fixed! Thanks for catching this!

@bradenmacdonald do you mind reviewing/merging this?

@bradenmacdonald do you mind reviewing/merging this?

@bradenmacdonald friendly reminder.

Sorry @jacobo-dominguez-wgu , I have a huge backlog of PRs at the moment. But it really helps that @BryanttV and @dcoa have already reviewed this, so I won't worry about manually testing it myself in that case.

Sorry @jacobo-dominguez-wgu , I have a huge backlog of PRs at the moment. But it really helps that @BryanttV and @dcoa have already reviewed this, so I won't worry about manually testing it myself in that case.

No worries, thank you so much!