Update the URL for "Python Mode for Processing 4" - #140
Open
ulgens wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
ulgens wants to merge 1 commit into
ulgens wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Sorry, something went wrong.
The main branch states that > It is not compatible with the latest major version of Processing, 4.0. > There is no longer anyone fixing bugs or developing new features. which gives the impression that this entry is a stale and should be removed from the list. Thanks to @SableRaf for sharing the branch that the actual work lives on.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Deploy Preview for processing-contributions ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The main branch states that
which gives the impression that this entry is a stale and should be removed from the list.
Thanks to @SableRaf for sharing the branch that the actual work lives on.