Activity

1. iritkatriel commented on Apr 11, 2022

   

   iritkatriel

   on Apr 11, 2022

   Member

   More actions

   What are you suggesting?
2. ravi140222 commented on Apr 11, 2022

   

   ravi140222

   on Apr 11, 2022

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   it should be like this,

   {'__add__', '__contains__', '__delattr__', '__delitem__',
    '__eq__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__',
   ...}
   

   instead of so many rows
   should I work on creating a pr for this?
3. ravi140222 commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   ravi140222

   on Apr 12, 2022

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   for a

   x = defaultdict(set)
   

   I get the output as,

   {'__add__', '__contains__', '__delattr__', '__delitem__',
    '__eq__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__',
   ...}
   

   when I use,

   pprint(x, compact=True) # after adding elements to it
   

   but the case I created this issue for, it does not work even after using compact=True

   I think so, the problem here is that one could nest defaultdicts
   that is,

   x = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(set))
   

   type(x)
   

   <class 'collections.defaultdict'>
   

   type(x['y']) # could use any key
   

   is again,

   <class 'collections.defaultdict'>
   

   the current pretty print cannot handle such a situation.
   this nesting could go even further, like,

   x = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(set)))
   

   pretty print needs to be changed, to handle nested defaultdicts.
4. arhadthedev

   added this to Contribution Queueon Apr 12, 2022
5. iritkatriel commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   iritkatriel

   on Apr 12, 2022

   Member

   More actions

   I don't understand. Can you write a complete script to reproduce what you are seeing?

   This is what I see:

   >>> p = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(set))
   >>> pprint(p, compact=True)
   defaultdict(<function <lambda> at 0x108f22fc0>, {})
   >>> pprint(p, compact=False)
   defaultdict(<function <lambda> at 0x108f22fc0>, {})
   
6. vainaixr commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   vainaixr

   on Apr 12, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   (this is my alternative account)
   just run this,

   def enhanced_dir(arg, categorize=True, show_types=False):
     from collections import defaultdict
     if not categorize: return dir(arg)
     passed = defaultdict(lambda : defaultdict(set))
     failed = defaultdict(set)
     passed_ = defaultdict(lambda : defaultdict(set))
     failed_ = defaultdict(lambda : defaultdict(set))
     x = arg
     for method in dir(arg):
       type_ = type(eval(f'x.{method}'))
       try:
         qualname = eval(f'x.{method}.__qualname__')
         qualname = qualname.split('.')
         passed['x'][qualname[0]].add(qualname[1])
         passed_['x'][type_].add(qualname[1])
       except:
         failed['x'].add(method)
         failed_['x'][type_].add(method)
     if show_types:
       return [passed, passed_]
     return passed
   

   from pprint import pprint
   pprint(enhanced_dir([1, 2, 3], show_types=True), compact=True)
   

   
   
7. wookie184 commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   wookie184

   on Apr 12, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   I don't think this is an issue with pretty print not being able to handle nested default dicts.

   This is the description in the docs for the compact parameter:

   compact impacts the way that long sequences (lists, tuples, sets, etc) are formatted. If compact is false (the default) then each item of a sequence will be formatted on a separate line. If compact is true, as many items as will fit within the width will be formatted on each output line.

   The key bit is "as many items as will fit within the width". As the default width is 80, as soon as the output is past that value you will end up with one item per line regardless of whether compact defined.
8. vainaixr commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   vainaixr

   on Apr 12, 2022

   Contributor

   More actions

   yes, thanks, I was not aware of using width, I am able to get the desired output, after increasing the width to 120.
9. iritkatriel commented on Apr 12, 2022

   

   iritkatriel

   on Apr 12, 2022

   Member

   More actions

   Thank you.
10. iritkatriel

    closed this as completedon Apr 12, 2022
11. iritkatriel

    moved this to Done in Contribution Queueon Apr 12, 2022