Fix parameter name in equivalent code snippet of enumerate - #101029
Merged
rhettinger merged 1 commit intoJan 14, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Sorry, something went wrong.
rhettinger
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
|
Thanks @JustAnotherArchivist for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
|
GH-101030 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2023
…honGH-101029) (cherry picked from commit ef633e5) Co-authored-by: JustAnotherArchivist <JustAnotherArchivist@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The parameter name was changed from sequence to iterable in commit d11ae5d. However, when the equivalent code snippet was added a couple of years later in commits 690d4ae / 9028928, it accidentally used the old name.
Trivial docs change, no issue exists, and no news entry needed.