gh-102660: Fix is_core_module() - #103257
Merged
ericsnowcurrently merged 1 commit intoApr 4, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Sorry, something went wrong.
ericsnowcurrently
requested review from
brettcannon,
encukou,
ncoghlan and
warsaw
as code owners
April 4, 2023 22:27
gaogaotiantian
pushed a commit
to gaogaotiantian/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2023
In pythongh-102744 we added is_core_module() (in Python/import.c), which relies on get_core_module_dict() (also added in that PR). The problem is that_PyImport_FixupBuiltin(), which ultimately calls is_core_module(), is called on the builtins module before interp->builtins_copyis set. Consequently, the builtins module isn't considered a "core" module while it is getting "fixed up" and its module def m_copy erroneously gets set. Under isolated interpreters this causes problems since sys and builtins are allowed even though they are still single-phase init modules. (This was discovered while working on pythongh-101660.) The solution is to stop relying on get_core_module_dict() in is_core_module().
warsaw
pushed a commit
to warsaw/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2023
In pythongh-102744 we added is_core_module() (in Python/import.c), which relies on get_core_module_dict() (also added in that PR). The problem is that_PyImport_FixupBuiltin(), which ultimately calls is_core_module(), is called on the builtins module before interp->builtins_copyis set. Consequently, the builtins module isn't considered a "core" module while it is getting "fixed up" and its module def m_copy erroneously gets set. Under isolated interpreters this causes problems since sys and builtins are allowed even though they are still single-phase init modules. (This was discovered while working on pythongh-101660.) The solution is to stop relying on get_core_module_dict() in is_core_module().
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In gh-102744 we added is_core_module() (in Python/import.c), which relies on 'get_core_module_dict()(also added in that PR). The problem is that_PyImport_FixupBuiltin(), which ultimately calls is_core_module(), is called on the builtins module before interp->builtins_copyis set. Consequently, the builtins module isn't considered a "core" module while it is getting "fixed up" and its module defm_copy` get set. Under isolated interpreters this causes problems since sys and builtins are allowed even though they are still single-phase init modules. (This was discovered while working on gh-101660.)
The solution is to stop relying on get_core_module_dict() in is_core_module().