| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Improve the context manager test.support.temp_cwd() to not remove the temporary directory, if a forked child terminates.
|
@akruis, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @serhiy-storchaka, @Yhg1s and @ncoghlan to be potential reviewers. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| class TempCwdTestCase(unittest.TestCase): | ||
| @unittest.skipUnless(hasattr(os, "fork"), "test requires os.fork") | ||
| def test_forked_child(self): | ||
| import sys |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it used?
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Opps, a left over from a debug print to sys.stderr
Sorry, something went wrong.
Remove an unused "import sys".
| yield path | ||
| finally: | ||
| if dir_created: | ||
| if dir_created and pid == os.getpid(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test is non obvious, can you please add a short comment explaining why you test the pid?
I guess that it's test to avoid that two processes try to remove the directory if the parent uses fork()?
Add bpo-30028 in the comment.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| randomize=True) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class TempCwdTestCase(unittest.TestCase): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please move this test to test_support.py which tests test.support.
test_regrtest tests Lib/test/libregrtest/.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Added an explanatory comment and moved the test to test_support.py. I also modified the test to be in line with the other tests of temp_cwd.
| @unittest.skipUnless(hasattr(os, "fork"), "test requires os.fork") | ||
| def test_temp_dir__forked_child(self): | ||
| """Test that a forked child process does not remove the directory.""" | ||
| with support.temp_cwd() as temp_path: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hum, please don't use fork in a test process. Write a short script run with test.support.script_helper. Otherwise, I expect too many issues like bad handling of KeyboardInterrupt. Use textwrap.dedent() to include the script directly here.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done (1a0364d). Is the patch now OK?
Sorry, something went wrong.
| # parent process | ||
| os.waitpid(pid, 0) # wait for the child to terminate | ||
| # make sure that temp_path is still present | ||
| assert os.path.isdir(temp_path), "Child removed temp_path." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would avoid assert keyword which might be removed depending on the Python option, but use an explicit if + raise Exception(...). But maybe it's ok, I don't know :-)
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since this is a subprocess, explicit os.exit() can be more appropriate.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm currently on a business trip and can't access my Linux box. I'll update the pull request on Thursday. But could you please agree on either raising AssertionError or a print() and explicit os.exit(). In the end it makes no difference.
Sorry, something went wrong.
An assert might removed depending on Python options.
|
@Haypo and @serhiy-storchaka: Any chance to get this PR merged? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
| pid = os.fork() | ||
| if pid != 0: | ||
| # parent process | ||
| os.waitpid(pid, 0) # wait for the child to terminate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please test that the child didn't fail.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| # make sure that temp_path is still present | ||
| if not os.path.isdir(temp_path): | ||
| raise AssertionError("Child removed temp_path.") | ||
| """)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a comment explaining that the child exits without removing the temporary directory.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't the comment above enough?
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
|
||
| @unittest.skipUnless(hasattr(os, "fork"), "test requires os.fork") | ||
| def test_temp_dir__forked_child(self): | ||
| """Test that a forked child process does not remove the directory.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a reference to the issue: bpo-30028
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No other doc string in this file contains a reference to bpo. Therefore I added the reference as a comment.
Sorry, something went wrong.
- better comments - make sure, that the child exits successfully
This commit merges the fix from C-Python pull request python#1066 (git commit 22e032a) for bpo-30028. Without this change $ ./python -m test.regrtest test_multiprocessing_fork fails. ($ ./python -m test.test_multiprocessing_fork is OK.) https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/112
This commit merges the fix from C-Python pull request python#1066 (git commit 22e032a) for bpo-30028. Without this change $ ./python -m test.regrtest test_multiprocessing_fork fails. ($ ./python -m test.test_multiprocessing_fork is OK.) https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/112 (grafted from bda8a9d487da7cfbe4357d5c4c7635e0de19c6af)
|
To try and help move older pull requests forward, we are going through and backfilling 'awaiting' labels on pull requests that are lacking the label. Based on the current reviews, the best we can tell in an automated fashion is that a core developer requested changes to be made to this pull request. If/when the requested changes have been made, please leave a comment that says, I have made the requested changes; please review again. That will trigger a bot to flag this pull request as ready for a follow-up review. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I think requests by @vstinner were satisfied. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
A news entry is not required since this function is for internal use, but it would be worth to add your name @akruis into Misc/ACKS. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Proposed by Serhiy Storchaka.
|
Is there anything, I can do to get this PR merged? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
|
GH-5824 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Sorry, @akruis and @gpshead, I could not cleanly backport this to 2.7 due to a conflict. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
Sorry, @akruis and @gpshead, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.6 due to a conflict. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
I'm not sure it is actually worth backporting this to 3.6 or 2.7 for this internal test support library issue but if you want to do so, just create PRs using cherry_picker and tag me on them for review/merge. :) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup.. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
|
GH-5825 is a backport of this pull request to the 2.7 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup.. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
|
GH-5826 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.6 branch. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
…-5825) Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup.. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
…-5826) Make test.support.temp_cwd() fork-safe. The context manager test.support.temp_cwd() no longer removes the temporary directory when executing in a process other than the parent it entered from. If a forked child exits the context manager it won't do the cleanup.. (cherry picked from commit 33dddac) Co-authored-by: Anselm Kruis <a.kruis@science-computing.de>
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
Improve the context manager test.support.temp_cwd() to not remove the temporary
directory, if a forked child terminates.
https://bugs.python.org/issue30028