| FazBrowse GitHub Viewer | Trending | | Home |
| Tools: [Download Repo ZIP] [Original HTTPS Page] |
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
| Back | FazBrowse Home | New Git URL |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityHow do you distinguish Solaris 5.10 and Solaris 51.0?
Maybe multiply the major version by 100 or 1000? or use a shift of 8 bits? The usage would be:
The disavantage is the need to write versions in hexadecimal :-(
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low Quality@erlend-aasland: Should we prefix new pyconfig.h constants by Py_ ? see: capi-workgroup/problems#46
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI think we should follow the PEP-7 recommendations: https://peps.python.org/pep-0007/#naming-conventions
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Choose a reason Spam Abuse Off Topic Outdated Duplicate Resolved Low QualityI see what you mean, but that's not happening. The leading 5 was dropped from the name 25 years ago and while e.g. uname and compilation targets still use it, nobody today calls it Solaris/SunOS 5.10; only Solaris 10. If we ever release Solaris 51, uname -r should report it as 5.51.
That said, I am not strongly against changing it if you still prefer your suggestion.
Thanks, I missed that. It's fixed now.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.